Michael Chiswick, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice & Anor
[2024] EWHC 1223 (Admin)
Kyle Parvez, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice
21 March 2024
[2024] EWHC 653 (Admin)
High Court
A court allowed a person to challenge a government decision because the person's arguments were strong enough. The court also canceled an earlier order that the person pay legal costs.
Key Facts
- •Judicial review claim brought by Kyle Parvez against the Secretary of State for Justice.
- •Permission for judicial review was initially refused by a judge on the papers.
- •Oral hearing held on March 21, 2024 before Fordham J.
Legal Principles
Arguability of a judicial review claim requires a realistic prospect of success.
High Court of Justice, King's Bench Division, Administrative Court
Outcomes
Permission for judicial review granted.
The claimant's arguments, as presented at the oral hearing, demonstrated arguability with a realistic prospect of success.
Costs order made on the papers when permission was refused is set aside.
The grant of permission for judicial review necessitates setting aside the previous costs order.
Similar Cases
Shane Wylie, R (on the application of) v Parole Board for England and Wales (Costs)
[2024] EWHC 728 (Admin)
Halton Borough Council, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
[2024] EWHC 705 (Admin)
MD Ayaz Karim, R (on the application of) v Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
[2024] EWHC 1368 (Admin)
Catherine Deborah Alexander v Legal Ombudsman
[2024] EWHC 886 (Admin)