Zygmunt Rawicz-Oledzki v Circuit Court in Poznan (Poland)
[2023] EWHC 2955 (Admin)
Extradition courts apply legal tests and principles to determine if there are bars to extradition; they do not decide guilt or innocence.
Case law and established principles
Section 21A considers the proportionality of extradition in relation to the seriousness of the allegations.
Section 21A of the relevant extradition legislation
Section 14 and Article 8 are relevant to the consideration of passage of time and private/family life.
Section 14 of the relevant extradition legislation; Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights
The appeal against extradition was refused.
The judge found no bars to extradition; the public interest in extradition outweighed the factors against it.
Permission to adduce fresh evidence was refused.
The evidence was deemed incapable of being decisive.
Permission to appeal was refused.
There was no realistic prospect of success.
[2023] EWHC 2955 (Admin)
[2023] EWHC 2899 (Admin)
[2024] EWHC 1337 (Admin)
[2024] EWHC 2380 (Admin)
[2024] EWHC 1756 (Admin)