Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

London Borough of Barking and Dagenham v Zannat Ara Aziz

21 May 2024
[2024] EWHC 1212 (Admin)
High Court
A homeowner wasn't told about a planning order. The court ruled that because she didn't know about it and it would have been cancelled if she'd appealed, she couldn't be punished for breaking it.

Key Facts

  • Planning enforcement prosecution against Zannat Ara Aziz for non-compliance with an enforcement notice.
  • Aziz claimed she was not served with the notice and was genuinely unaware of its existence.
  • Magistrates acquitted Aziz, applying the Statutory Disapplication (s.285(2) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990).
  • The enforcement notice was dated 9 April 2019, requiring compliance by 9 August 2019.
  • Aziz was the pre-existing owner of the land.
  • The enforcement notice was on the statutory register but not served on Aziz.
  • Aziz did not know and could not reasonably have been expected to know about the enforcement notice.
  • Aziz's interests were substantially prejudiced by the failure to serve her.

Legal Principles

Statutory Appeal Grounds (s.174(2)): An appeal against an enforcement notice can be brought on various grounds, including non-service as required by s.172.

Town and Country Planning Act 1990

Statutory Defence (s.179(7)): It is a defence to a s.179 offence if the defendant was not served with an unregistered enforcement notice and was genuinely unaware of its existence.

Town and Country Planning Act 1990

Statutory Disapplication (s.285(2)): In s.179 proceedings, a Non-Newcomer who was not served, genuinely and excusably unaware of an enforcement notice, and substantially prejudiced by the lack of service, can challenge the notice's validity on Statutory Appeal Grounds.

Town and Country Planning Act 1990

Registration of enforcement notices encourages vigilance. While not always fatal to a defense, it is a relevant factor in determining whether a defendant could reasonably have been expected to know of the notice.

R v Collett [1994] 1 WLR 475

A served defendant cannot use unawareness as a defense; the Statutory Appeal Grounds are not available as defenses in s.179 proceedings.

Wicks [1998] AC 92

Outcomes

Appeal dismissed.

The Magistrates' acquittal was correct. The Statutory Disapplication (s.285(2)) allows a Non-Newcomer who meets specific criteria to challenge the validity of an enforcement notice in s.179 proceedings, even if the notice was registered. The court found that the key findings supported an acquittal, as the lack of service, genuine unawareness, and substantial prejudice meant the enforcement notice would likely have been quashed on appeal.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.