Vojtech Drahonsky v District Court of Usti Nad Laden (Czech Republic)
[2023] EWHC 2858 (Admin)
Proportionality under Article 8 ECHR in extradition cases; balancing public interest in extradition against interference with family life.
Re HH and PH –v- Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, Genoa: F-K (FC) –v- Judicial Authority [2012] UKSC 25
Appellate court's role in reviewing proportionality: Can only overturn if the first instance judge 'ought to have decided a question before him…differently' and doing so would require discharge (section 27(2) and (3) Extradition Act 2003).
Love v USA [2018] EWHC 172 (Admin), Re B [2013] 1 WLR 1943
Assessing seriousness of alleged offending: Judgements against domestic standards, respecting requesting state's views; maximum penalty is a relevant but limited consideration; key factors are the nature and quality of acts, culpability, and harm caused.
Miraszewski v Poland [2014] EWHC 4261 (Admin)
Appeal dismissed.
The Court found the District Judge's assessment of the seriousness of the offending, the weight given to family separation, and the consideration of Fiserova's transformation were not wrong. The public interest in extradition, given Fiserova's fugitive status, outweighed the Article 8 concerns.
[2023] EWHC 2858 (Admin)
[2024] EWHC 1768 (Admin)
[2024] EWHC 2226 (Admin)
[2023] EWHC 2902 (Admin)
[2024] EWHC 428 (Admin)