CD v MD
[2024] EWHC 118 (Fam)
Test for apparent bias: Would a fair-minded and informed observer conclude that there was a real possibility/danger that the tribunal was biased?
Porter v McGill [2001] UKHL 67; Re: Medicaments case
The fair-minded observer is not unduly sensitive or suspicious.
Helow v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 62
Where there are real grounds for doubt as to a lack of bias, it should be resolved in favour of recusal.
Civil Procedure Rules, Part 1.1, paragraph 1.1.3 (editorial notes)
Appeal allowed on ground 1 (recusal).
The email from HHJ Carroll demonstrated apparent bias. The judge found that a fair-minded observer would conclude there was a real possibility the panel was biased, having formed views in private before hearing evidence and submissions on mitigation. This was not simply a provisional view expressed in an open hearing.
[2024] EWHC 118 (Fam)
[2024] EWCA Civ 665
[2024] EWHC 1676 (Admin)
[2023] EWCA Crim 615
[2024] EWHC 2946 (Admin)