Bellini (N/E) Ltd v Brit UW Limited
[2024] EWCA Civ 435
Contractual interpretation requires an objective assessment of what a reasonable person would understand the contract to mean, considering the background knowledge available to the parties.
Wood v Capita [2017] UKSC 24 and Financial Conduct Authority v Arch Insurance (UK) Ltd [2021] UKSC 1
Where a word is expressly defined in a contract, the court will generally give effect to that definition.
Lewison on the Interpretation of Contracts, 7th Ed.
Arguments of redundancy are given limited weight in construing insurance contracts.
Unspecified case law, mentioned in section 31
The court found that clause 8.2.6 of the Policy provides no cover in the absence of physical damage as defined in the policy.
The policy expressly defined 'damage' as physical loss, physical damage, or physical destruction. The court found no ambiguity or inconsistency in the wording of clause 8.2.6, rejecting the claimant's argument that 'damage' should have a broader meaning in this context. The court emphasized the express definition of 'damage' and the lack of justification for departing from it.
[2024] EWCA Civ 435
[2024] EWHC 394 (Comm)
[2024] EWCA Civ 1110
[2024] EWCA Civ 1281
[2023] EWHC 245 (Comm)