Robert Day v Forex Capital Markets Limited
[2023] EWHC 1349 (Comm)
A firm may treat a client as an EPC if it complies with an adequate assessment of the client's expertise, experience, and knowledge, and follows a specific procedure.
COBS 3.5.3R
Before accepting a request for EPC reclassification, a firm must take all reasonable steps to ensure the client satisfies the qualitative and quantitative tests.
COBS 3.5.6R
A retail client's liability for restricted speculative investments is limited to account funds (NBP).
COBS 22.5.17R
Contravention of FCA rules is actionable if a private person suffers loss, but does not make any transaction void or unenforceable.
FSMA 138D(2), 138E(2)
IG's claim succeeded.
The court found IG complied with COBS rules 3.5.3R and 3.5.6R in reclassifying Tchenguiz as an EPC. Even if a breach had occurred, FSMA section 138E(2) prevents the transaction from being void or unenforceable. Tchenguiz's failure to bring a counterclaim for damages was also a factor.
[2023] EWHC 1349 (Comm)
[2024] EWHC 27 (Comm)
[2023] EWHC 3058 (Ch)
[2022] UKFTT 523 (GRC)
[2024] EWHC 98 (KB)