Pan Ocean Co Ltd v Daelim Corporation
[2023] EWHC 391 (Comm)
Contractual interpretation involves ascertaining the objective meaning of the language used, considering the contract as a whole and the available background knowledge.
The Ocean Neptune [2018] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 654, [8]; The Eleni P [2019] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 365, [10]
In a charterparty, if a clause allocates liability for repair time to the charterer, the owners do not have to prove actual loss of time; the claim is in debt.
The Nicki R [1984] 2 Lloyd’s LR 186
Charterers' appeal dismissed.
The court upheld the tribunal's finding that Clause 86 created a claim in debt for cleaning time, even after redelivery. The phrase 'always at Charterers’ time' was interpreted to mean the Charterers are always liable for the time spent on cleaning, regardless of whether it occurred before or after redelivery. The court emphasized that if the parties intended a claim for 'loss of time', the clause would have stated so explicitly.
[2023] EWHC 391 (Comm)
[2022] EWCA Civ 1555
[2024] UKSC 2
[2023] EWCA Civ 569
[2024] EWHC 2075 (Comm)