Key Facts
- •Amelia Miggiano applied for permission to appeal the dismissal of her claim that a property transfer signature was forged.
- •The transfer of property 'Bella Vista' from Mrs. Miggiano to her son Andrew was disputed.
- •The trial judge, His Honour Judge Jarman KC, found the signature genuine.
- •The expert witness, Paul Craddock, concluded the signature was likely genuine, though with moderate evidence.
- •Mrs. Miggiano appeared in person with family assistance.
- •The defendant, Islwyn Evans, was the executor of Andrew Miggiano's estate.
Legal Principles
An appeal court should not interfere with a trial judge's conclusions on primary facts unless the judge was plainly wrong. A decision is only overturned if no reasonable judge could have reached it.
Volpi v Volpi [2022] EWCA Civ 464, paragraph 2
In the absence of identifiable errors (e.g., material error of law, critical finding with no basis in evidence, misunderstanding/failure to consider relevant evidence), an appellate court will only interfere if the trial judge's decision is unjustifiable.
Henderson v Foxworth Investments Limited [2014] UKSC 41, paragraph 67
Appellate courts should not interfere with trial judge findings of fact unless compelled to do so. This includes findings of primary fact, evaluation of facts, and inferences drawn from them.
Fage UK Limited v Chobani Limited [2014] EWCA Civ 5, paragraph 114
Permission to appeal can only be given if there's a real prospect of success or another compelling reason.
Civil Procedure Rule 52.7
Outcomes
Permission to appeal denied.
The appeal lacked a real prospect of success. The trial judge's decision was supported by evidence, including expert testimony, contemporaneous documentation, and witness accounts. The appellant failed to demonstrate any error of law or reasoning by the trial judge.