Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

Charles Elphicke v Times Media Ltd

14 October 2024
[2024] EWHC 2595 (KB)
High Court
A former MP sued a newspaper. He dropped the case, but the newspaper wanted its legal costs paid. The judge agreed, but reduced the amount the MP had to pay because the newspaper had broken some rules of the court. The judge also ordered that both sides should try to sort out their remaining disagreements through mediation before going to a full hearing.

Key Facts

  • Claimant, a former MP, sued Defendant for defamation relating to rape allegations.
  • Claimant discontinued the case before trial.
  • Defendant sought an interim payment of costs (£260,000).
  • Claimant argued for no costs order due to Defendant's misconduct.
  • Defendant's misconduct included breach of CPR 32.12 (collateral use of witness statements) and failure to preserve evidence.
  • Judge considered recusal due to her trans identity but decided to proceed.
  • The case involved a woman who alleged rape and whose centrality must not be diminished.

Legal Principles

Costs on discontinuance: CPR 38.6 presumes the discontinuing party pays costs unless the court orders otherwise.

CPR 38.6

Collateral use of witness statements: CPR 32.12 prohibits using witness statements for purposes other than the proceedings, except with consent, court permission, or if the statement was evidence in a public hearing.

CPR 32.12

Duty to preserve evidence: CPR 31 PD 31B para.7 imposes a duty to preserve disclosable material.

CPR 31 PD 31B para.7

Costs considerations: CPR 44.2 allows the court to consider all circumstances of the case, including conduct before, during, and potentially after proceedings, when determining costs orders.

CPR 44.2

Costs assessment: CPR 44.11 allows a Costs Judge to disallow costs due to unreasonable or improper conduct before, during, or in assessment proceedings.

CPR 44.11

Discretion to depart from default costs order: Courts have discretion to depart from the default costs order on discontinuance (CPR 38.6) if there's good reason, often involving unreasonable defendant conduct.

Brookes v HSBC Bank [2011] EWCA Civ 354

Proportionate sanctions for misconduct: Sanctions for misconduct, even dishonesty, must be proportionate to the offense and its impact on costs.

Abbott v Long [2012] RTR 1

Interim costs payments: CPR 44.2(8) presumes interim costs payments unless good reason exists not to.

CPR 44.2(8)

Outcomes

Judge refused to recuse herself.

Neither party objected, and recusal would waste resources. The first duty of a judge is to decide the case.

Defendant's costs reduced by 20%.

Breach of CPR 32.12 (collateral use of witness statements) and failure to preserve evidence were serious and justified a reduction. Other alleged misconduct was left for the Costs Judge.

Interim payment order deferred.

Quantum of interim payment remains open, and directions will be given.

Mandatory ADR ordered before detailed assessment.

To avoid lengthy and costly detailed assessment proceedings, the parties must engage in ADR.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.