David Hamon and Ors v University College London
[2023] EWHC 1812 (KB)
Group Litigation Order (GLO) criteria under CPR Part 19.
CPR 19.21, 19.22
Court's general case management powers under CPR 3.1.
CPR 3.1
Considerations for GLO applications (consolidation or representative parties).
PD 19B para 2.3
Binding effect of decisions in test cases.
Abbott and others v Ministry of Defence [2023] EWHC 2839 (KB)
Proper particularisation of claims in group actions.
Manning & Napier v Tesco plc [2017] EWHC 3296 (Ch)
GLO application refused.
Court found that existing case management powers suffice; GLO would not promote fairness, save costs, or improve efficiency; test cases will address common issues, with precedent binding other claimants.
Test cases to proceed.
To determine common issues of liability and quantum, with findings binding other claimants via precedent and res judicata.
Case management order made.
Addresses issues such as service of documents, responses to requests for information, schedules of information, and costs sharing.
[2023] EWHC 1812 (KB)
[2023] EWHC 1792 (KB)
[2023] EWHC 685 (KB)
[2023] EWHC 2710 (KB)
[2024] EWHC 1071 (TCC)