Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

DBH v North Lincolnshire And Goole NHS Foundation Trust

25 October 2024
[2024] EWHC 2652 (KB)
High Court
A seriously injured child needed a new home. The judge agreed he needed one and gave the family a large amount of money to buy a house now. However, there wasn't enough evidence to show the judge the house was a reasonable price, so the judge didn't give them extra money to buy the most expensive house that they wanted.

Key Facts

  • Claim for interim payments for a child (DBH) with cerebral palsy due to admitted medical negligence.
  • Claim stayed until July 2027, quantum trial unlikely before July 2029.
  • Claimant seeks £2,200,000 for property purchase and therapies.
  • Parties agree claimant's current accommodation is unsuitable and new home preferable to rental.
  • No dispute between experts on the need for rehousing.
  • Claimant's life expectancy estimated at 51 for the purpose of this application.
  • Parties agree on legal principles governing interim payments, based on *Eeles v Cobham Hire Services Limited* [2009] EWCA Civ 204 and *XS1 v West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust* [2024] EWHC 1865(KB).

Legal Principles

Assessment of heads of loss for interim payments (Eeles Limb 1): Pain, suffering, loss of amenity, past losses, interest, accommodation costs.

Eeles v Cobham Hire Services Limited [2009] EWCA Civ 204

Consideration of additional future loss in Eeles Limb 1: Only if real need, not desire; sum must be reasonable; conservative assessment.

Eeles v Cobham Hire Services Limited [2009] EWCA Civ 204

Eeles Limb 2: Assessment if unjust not to permit funding for a move now, considering the real need and reasonableness of costs.

Eeles v Cobham Hire Services Limited [2009] EWCA Civ 204

Court's role in interim payment decisions: Avoid keeping claimant out of entitled money; avoid overpayment; consider potential impact on final award.

Eeles v Cobham Hire Services Limited [2009] EWCA Civ 204 and XS1 v West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust [2024] EWHC 1865(KB)

Calculation of accommodation costs: *Swift v Carpenter* [2020] EWCA Civ 1295 formula to avoid windfall to claimant's estate.

Swift v Carpenter [2020] EWCA Civ 1295

Outcomes

Interim payment awarded under Eeles Limb 1: £2,193,810.39 (after deduction of previous interim payments).

Conservative valuation of claimant's needs, considering past and projected losses (for 12 months only). Court accepted a 90% proportion of the calculated conservative valuation as reasonable.

Eeles Limb 2 claim refused.

Insufficient evidence to deem the cost of the claimant's chosen property reasonable. Lack of comparable expert evidence from the claimant's side.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.