AXA v Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
[2024] EWHC 2499 (KB)
Court approval of settlement is required for protected parties under CPR 21.10.
CPR 21.10
Court must act in the best interests of the protected party and in the interests of justice, having regard to the overriding objective.
CPR 21.10
Court must ensure continuity of payment under the order is reasonably secure (Damages Act 1996, sections 2(3) and 2(4)(c)).
CPR 41.7-9, PD41B, Damages Act 1996, sections 2(3) and 2(4)(c)
The proposed settlement was approved.
The court found the settlement to be in the best interests of the Claimant, considering the litigation risks and disputed issues regarding the extent of future care needs.
A lump sum of £3,850,000 was awarded, along with periodical payments for future care and case management.
This structure was deemed to best meet the Claimant's needs.
£124,631.13 was awarded to the Claimant's parents for past gratuitous care.
In line with CPR 21.12.