Polypipe Limited v Peter Russell Davidson
[2023] EWHC 1681 (Comm)
It is the taxpayer's responsibility to correctly declare VAT payable.
Master Davison's judgment
Under-recording of VAT, regardless of legal position between claimant and HMRC, diminishes the asset's value.
Master Davison's judgment
Expert evidence is necessary when assessing a complex accounting matter like VAT under-recording.
Master Davison's judgment
Defendant's application to set aside the order for expert evidence was refused.
Expert evidence is necessary to assess the extent of any VAT under-recording, and the defendant's arguments against it were unconvincing.
The order for a jointly instructed expert was revoked.
Concerns about the defendant's ability to pay for the expert and fairness to the defendant warrant allowing each side to instruct its own expert.
Sequential disclosure of expert evidence was ordered.
Claimant to provide evidence first, then defendant can respond and provide their own evidence if needed.
The trial date was postponed.
The expert evidence process will take time.
[2023] EWHC 1681 (Comm)
[2024] EWHC 2222 (Ch)
[2023] EWHC 749 (Ch)
[2023] EWHC 2406 (Ch)
[2024] EWHC 1071 (TCC)