Andrew Kasongo v CRBE Limited & Anor
[2023] EWHC 1464 (KB)
Occupiers' Liability Act 1984
Occupiers' Liability Act 1984
Negligence
Common law
The court found that the claimant likely sidestepped the gate, not opened it.
Based on CCTV footage analysis, claimant's actions before approaching the gate, and the unlikelihood of a sober and aware individual opening a supposedly alarmed gate. Reconstructions were deemed of limited value.
The claimant's application to amend the Particulars of Claim was rendered moot.
The proposed amendments were causally relevant only if the claimant opened the gate, which the court did not find.
The claim was discontinued with no order for costs.
No other viable allegations against the defendant remained, and the claim against the train's PSA was unlikely to succeed.
[2023] EWHC 1464 (KB)
[2023] EWHC 3338 (Admin)
[2023] EWHC 526 (KB)
[2024] EWHC 2227 (KB)
[2023] EWCA Civ 224