Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

The University of Birmingham v Persons Unknown & Anor

[2024] EWHC 1529 (KB)
Students protested on university land. The university sued to get them off. The judge said some students could stay because they might have a right to protest there, but others had to leave because of vandalism and threats.

Key Facts

  • Students at the University of Birmingham set up protest camps (Green Heart (GH) and Chancellor's Court (CC)) to protest against the University's alleged complicity in Israeli actions in Gaza.
  • The University sought possession orders against the protesters, initially described as 'persons unknown', under CPR Part 55.
  • The protesters presented six demands related to investment transparency, divestment from companies involved in the Israeli occupation, and protection of the right to protest.
  • The University issued notices to quit but did not seek an injunction before initiating legal proceedings.
  • The hearing involved approximately 20 students and members of the public; one student represented the protesters.
  • Evidence included witness statements, social media posts, security logs, and the University's Code of Practice on Freedom of Speech.
  • Allegations of vandalism, intimidation, and disruption of University events were made.
  • The University argued that the students’ rights under the Human Rights Act 1998 and the Education Act 1986 did not justify trespassing.

Legal Principles

Possession claims against trespassers under CPR Part 55.

CPR Part 55

Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) and its compatibility with Convention rights (Article 10: freedom of expression; Article 11: freedom of assembly and association).

Human Rights Act 1998

Education Act 1986, Section 43: Universities' duty to secure freedom of speech.

Education Act 1986

Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023: Duties of registered higher education providers to protect and promote freedom of speech.

Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023

Case law concerning protests on private land and the balance between freedom of expression/assembly and property rights (McPhail, Appleby, Djemal, Meier, SOAS, UoB, Ineos, Cuciurean).

Various Case Laws

Outcomes

Granted limited possession orders.

Insufficient evidence to justify possession against students at GH due to arguable defences related to the HRA and Education Acts. Possession granted against non-students on the Edgbaston campus and against all persons at CC due to evidence of vandalism and intimidation.

Adjourned the remaining applications.

To allow the students to obtain legal representation and present evidence.

Allocated the claim to the multi-track.

Complexity of the issues.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.