Kenneth Larsson v Revolut Limited
[2024] EWHC 1287 (Ch)
In summary judgment applications, the court assesses if the claimant has a real prospect of success, considering evidence available and reasonably expected at trial. The court should be cautious in fraud cases, requiring cogent evidence.
Easyair Ltd v Opal Telecom Limited [2009] EWHC 339 (Ch), Foglia v The Family Officer Limited and Others [2021] EWHC 650 (Comm), King v Steifel [2021] EWHC 1045 (Comm)
The court should not conduct a mini-trial but may analyze factual assertions and consider if issues are susceptible to early disposal.
Easyair Ltd v Opal Telecom Limited [2009] EWHC 339 (Ch)
Expert evidence must comply with CPR Part 35.
New Media Distribution Company SEZC Ltd v Konstantin Kagalovsky [2018] EWHC 2742 (Ch)
Res judicata may operate between defendants if there's a conflict of interest, deciding the conflict is necessary for plaintiff relief, and the question was judicially decided.
Spencer Bower & Handley on Res Judicata
Summary judgment granted to Banque Paribas.
Verdi had no real prospect of success. The evidence overwhelmingly demonstrated the falsity of the documents supporting Verdi's claim (the Sparx account, SWIFT messages, and emails). The expert evidence further undermined Verdi's case. The argument regarding other defendants was rejected due to procedural issues and lack of a true conflict of interest.
[2024] EWHC 1287 (Ch)
[2024] EWHC 98 (KB)
[2023] UKSC 25
[2024] EWHC 7 (Ch)
[2023] EWHC 3309 (Comm)