Wayne Leighton v Chief Constable Of North Yorkshire Police
[2024] EWHC 2426 (KB)
Elements of malicious prosecution: prosecution by defendant, ending in claimant's favour, lack of reasonable and probable cause, malice, and damage.
Stuart v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago [2022] UKPC 53
Reasonable and probable cause means an honest belief based on reasonable grounds that there is a proper case for court.
Glinski v McIver [1962] AC 726
Malice means an improper motive; may be inferred from lack of reasonable and probable cause.
Clerk & Lindsell on Torts, Williamson v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago [2014] UKPC 29
To prove lack of reasonable and probable cause, claimant must identify circumstances of prosecution and information used.
Clerk & Lindsell, Abrath v North Eastern Railway Co (1883) 11 QBD 440, Glinski v McIver [1962] AC 726
In a 'no case to answer' submission, defendant elects not to call evidence; judge decides on claimant's evidence.
Boyce v Wyatt Engineering [2001] EWCA Civ 692, Benham Ltd v Kythria Investments Ltd [2003] EWCA Civ 1794
Privy Council dismissed the appeal.
Appellant failed to provide evidence regarding the circumstances of the prosecution and the information the police acted upon, thus not establishing lack of reasonable and probable cause.
[2024] EWHC 2426 (KB)
[2023] UKPC 4
[2024] UKPC 15
[2024] UKPC 21
[2024] EWHC 2868 (Admin)