Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

R v McGinley

[2023] EWHC 2117 (SCCO)
Lawyers appealed a decision on how much they should be paid for a modern slavery case. The judge said the rules for calculating payment changed after the case, so the old rules had to be used. The judge agreed the crimes were serious but not sexual, so the original payment amount was correct.

Key Facts

  • Appeal concerns classification of offences under the Criminal Legal Aid (Remuneration) Regulations 2013 for graduated fee calculation.
  • Representation Orders made in November 2017, subject to regulations as in force then.
  • Defendants charged with conspiracy to hold in servitude, conspiracy to require forced labour, conspiracy to traffic for exploitation, conspiracy to arrange travel for exploitation, and assault causing actual bodily harm.
  • Offences involved forcing a vulnerable adult into compulsory labour and trafficking.
  • Appellants argued for Class J classification (serious sexual offences), while Determining Officer classified as Class B (serious violence or damage).
  • Pre-April 2018 Table used for classification, with unlisted offences defaulting to Class H.
  • Appellants sought retrospective application of the AGFS Banding Document (post-April 2018).

Legal Principles

Offence classification under Schedule 1 to the 2013 Regulations is a key criterion for calculating graduated fees.

Criminal Legal Aid (Remuneration) Regulations 2013, Schedule 1

Pre-April 2018, offences were classified using the 'pre-April 2018 Table' in Part 7 of Schedule 1; post-April 2018, the AGFS Banding Document was used.

Criminal Legal Aid (Remuneration) Regulations 2013, Schedule 1

Offences not specifically listed in the pre-April 2018 Table are classified as Class H, with potential for reclassification.

Criminal Legal Aid (Remuneration) Regulations 2013, Schedule 1, paragraph 3

The AGFS Banding Document cannot be applied retrospectively to cases governed by the pre-April 2018 regulations.

R v Parveen Khan (SCCO 179/11, 31 January 2012)

Only serious sexual offences can be classified as Class J.

R v Parveen Khan (SCCO 179/11, 31 January 2012)

Outcomes

Appeal dismissed.

The AGFS Banding Document cannot be applied retrospectively. The offences, while serious, do not qualify as Class J because they are not sexual offences. Class B classification is appropriate given the elements of serious violence and similarities to kidnapping and false imprisonment.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.