Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

R v William McGinley

18 March 2024
[2024] EWHC 702 (SCCO)
Senior Courts Costs Office
A lawyer appealed because the government wouldn't pay him for a case that kept getting delayed and restarted several times. Even though the case eventually fell apart, the judge ruled that because the case had a scheduled date, the lawyer should get paid.

Key Facts

  • Appeal against the Legal Aid Agency's (LAA) decision to recoup a 'cracked' trial fee under the Advocate's Graduated Fees Scheme (AGFS).
  • The case involved numerous trial and retrials due to various issues including juror unavailability, witness unavailability, ill health of defendants and judge, and the Bar Action strikes.
  • The prosecution ultimately offered no evidence on 18th November 2022, after a period of adjournment to consider whether to proceed with a further retrial.
  • The trial was listed as a 'fixture' for 8th April 2024 before the prosecution offered no evidence.

Legal Principles

A 'cracked trial' fee under AGFS is payable only if a trial is aborted or a jury is unable to reach a verdict, with the prosecution later offering no evidence, and the case was again considered ready for trial by being given a fixture listing or placed in a warned list.

Criminal Legal Aid (Remuneration) Regulations 2013, Schedule 2, and Crown Court Fee Guidance, paragraphs 26-27

In R v. Pelepenko (2002), a cracked trial fee is payable only after an aborted trial where the prosecution confirms proceeding to another trial, and the case subsequently cracks.

R v. Pelepenko [2002], SCCO Ref: X27A (Costs Judge Rogers)

Outcomes

Appeal allowed. The appellant is entitled to a 'cracked' trial fee.

The case, despite an adjournment to allow the prosecution to decide on a retrial, was considered ready for trial and had a fixture listing. The court considered this satisfied the requirements for a 'cracked' trial fee, despite the eventual decision of the prosecution to offer no evidence.

Appellant to be remitted the £100 paid to lodge the appeal.

Standard costs associated with a successful appeal.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.