BD v BJ
[2023] EWHC 1613 (Fam)
Habitual residence of a child is determined by the place reflecting the child's integration into a social and family environment.
Article 3 of the Hague Convention, various case laws cited in section 34
Consent to a child's relocation requires a clear and unequivocal agreement.
Re G (Consent; Discretion) [2021] EWCA Civ 139
Acquiescence requires the wronged parent's subjective consent or passive acceptance of the child's continued presence in the new location. Exceptional cases exist where outward behavior clearly shows non-assertion of the right to return.
Re H and Others (Minors) (Abduction: Acquiescence) [1998] AC 72; JM v RM (Abduction: Retention: Acquiescence) [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
Discretion to order a child's return under the Hague Convention considers swift return, home country decisions, comity, deterrence, individual circumstances, and child welfare.
Re M (Abduction: Zimbabwe) [2007] UKHL 55; Re G (Abduction: Consent/Discretion) [2021] EWCA Civ 139
Application for the return of J to Canada dismissed.
Child J was found to be habitually resident in England by May 2023 due to sufficient integration into English life. Alternatively, the father acquiesced to J's continued stay in England.