Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

Kevin King, trading as Kevin King & Sons Transport, Re

8 February 2024
[2024] UKUT 47 (AAC)
Upper Tribunal
A haulage business owner and his company lost their licenses because the owner let his driver use his digital driving card to falsify driving records. He also lied to officials about it. A higher court agreed that taking away the licenses was the right thing to do.

Key Facts

  • Kevin King (trading as Kevin King & Sons Transport) and KD Plant & Haulage Ltd. appealed the revocation of their operator's licences and Mr. King's disqualification as a transport manager.
  • The Traffic Commissioner (TC) found Mr. King knowingly allowed his driver, Jason Day, to use his digital tachograph card, pressured Day to commit drivers' hours offences, failed to cooperate with a DVSA investigation, and made a false application for an operator's licence.
  • The TC also found Ms. Wallace, a director of KD Plant & Haulage Ltd., failed to make full disclosure in the licence application.
  • The appeal focused on whether the TC's findings of fact were correct, whether the regulatory action was proportionate, and whether sufficient reasons were given.

Legal Principles

Wednesbury unreasonableness

Associated Provincial Picture Houses Limited v. Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 K.B. 223

Upper Tribunal review of Traffic Commissioner decisions – ‘plainly wrong’ test

Bradley Fold Travel Limited and Peter Wright v. Secretary of State for Transport [2010] EWCA Civ 695, [2011] R.T.R. 13

Priority Freight question: How likely is the operator to comply in future?

Priority Freight Limited and Williams 2009/225

Bryan Haulage question: Should the operator be put out of business?

Bryan Haulage Limited (No. 2) 217/2002

Goods Vehicles (Licensing of Operators) Act 1995, sections 13, 13A, 26, 27, 28, and Schedule 3

Goods Vehicles (Licensing of Operators) Act 1995

Outcomes

Appeal dismissed

The Upper Tribunal found the TC's findings of fact were reasonable and supported by the evidence. The regulatory action, including licence revocation and disqualifications, was deemed proportionate given the severity of Mr. King's and Ms. Wallace's actions.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.