SR v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP)
[2024] UKUT 308 (AAC)
Principle of finality in social security decisions.
Social Security Act 1998, section 17(1)
Decisions must be based on formal and identifiable decisions.
CA/1020/2007 (Social Security Commissioner’s decision)
Upper Tribunal directions on remittal must be followed by the FTT.
Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, section 12(2)(b)(i); BPP Holdings Ltd v Revenue & Customs Commissioners [2016] 1 WLR 1915
Supersession decisions effective date rules.
Social Security Act 1998, section 10(5); Universal Credit, PIP, JSA and ESA (Decisions and Appeals) Regulations 2013, regulation 35, Schedule 1, paragraphs 12 and 14
A tribunal cannot change its decision once it has been given orally.
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWCA Civ 1175
The UT allowed the appeal.
The FTT's decision was flawed due to inadequate reasoning, confusion about the supersession date, and changing its decision after oral announcement. The correct start date for the enhanced PIP was 16 January 2018.
The FTT's decision of 11 August 2021 was set aside.
Error of law.
The UT remade the FTT's decision.
Awarding enhanced PIP rates for daily living and mobility from 16 January 2018 to 15 January 2028.
[2024] UKUT 308 (AAC)
[2023] UKUT 58 (AAC)
[2024] UKUT 327 (AAC)
[2024] UKUT 185 (AAC)
[2024] UKUT 282 (AAC)