Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

The Governing Body of School T v AA & Anor

28 November 2023
[2023] UKUT 311 (AAC)
Upper Tribunal
A school stopped a student with autism from attending due to challenging behavior and staff shortages. The first court sided with the parents, saying the school's actions were unfair. The appeals court disagreed, finding errors in the first court's decision on whether the school's actions were ongoing and whether they were a fair way to deal with the situation. The case will go back to court for a fresh look.

Key Facts

  • School T refused on-site education for student A (14, autistic) due to challenging behaviour and staff shortages exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Parents (Respondents) claimed discrimination under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010.
  • First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found in favour of the parents, ruling the school's decision was disproportionate.
  • School (Appellant) appealed to the Upper Tribunal (UT), arguing the FTT erred on time limits and proportionality.
  • A was subsequently placed in a distant care home, further complicating the case.

Legal Principles

Definition of 'continuing act' versus 'act with continuing consequences' in discrimination claims.

Various case laws cited (e.g., Virdi, Barclays Bank, Hendricks, Amies, Parr, Sougrin, Chaudhary, Calder, Tait, Cast, Owusu)

Time limits for bringing discrimination claims under Schedule 17 of the Equality Act 2010.

Equality Act 2010, Schedule 17, paragraph 4

Objective justification under section 15(1)(b) of the Equality Act 2010 requires proportionality assessment.

Equality Act 2010, section 15(1)(b); Homer, Akerman-Livingstone

Outcomes

Upper Tribunal allowed the appeal.

The FTT erred in its determination of the time limit and in its proportionality assessment.

FTT decision set aside and remitted.

The UT found errors of law in the FTT's handling of the time limit issue (continuing act vs. one-off act with continuing consequences) and its analysis of proportionality (failure to consider staff and pupil safety adequately).

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.