Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

Glydelyn Mae Caguitla v The Secretary of State for the Home Department

27 April 2023
[2023] UKUT 116 (IAC)
Upper Tribunal
A's mom got British citizenship, meaning she no longer had the required immigration permission. Because of this, A (who was over 18) didn't meet UK rules to stay, so her application was denied.

Key Facts

  • Glydelyn Mae Caguitla (A), a Philippine national, applied for indefinite leave to remain in the UK.
  • A's mother (M) initially entered the UK as a domestic worker and later obtained British citizenship.
  • A's application was refused because she did not meet the requirements of paragraphs 197 and 199 of the Immigration Rules.
  • A was over 18 at the time of application and her mother was a British citizen, not holding leave under the relevant paragraphs of the Immigration Rules.

Legal Principles

To meet the requirements of paragraph 197(ii) of the Immigration Rules, an applicant must be under 18 or have current leave as the child of a person with leave under paragraphs 128-193.

Immigration Rules, paragraph 197(ii)

To meet the requirements of paragraph 197(i) or 199(i), the parent must have leave; British citizenship does not satisfy this requirement.

Immigration Rules, paragraphs 197(i), 199(i)

Leave is a concept applicable only to those who are not British citizens (Immigration Act 1971, s.3(1)).

Immigration Act 1971, s. 3(1)

Outcomes

Appeal dismissed.

A did not meet the requirements of paragraphs 197(ii) and 199(i) of the Immigration Rules because she was over 18 and her mother was a British citizen (not holding relevant leave). The Tribunal found no disproportionality in refusing her application.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.