Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

James Barker v Chantelle Kiran Shokar

17 January 2024
[2024] UKUT 17 (LC)
Upper Tribunal
A landlord was ordered to repay rent because a tribunal said his house was an unlicensed house with too many tenants. He appealed, arguing a room in his house was a separate apartment and shouldn't count toward the total. The higher court agreed, finding the room was a separate apartment, meaning there weren't enough tenants to make it an unlicensed house, and the landlord didn't have to repay the rent.

Key Facts

  • Appeal against a rent repayment order made by the First-tier Tribunal (FTT).
  • Property in question: 14 Bassett Road, London, a large townhouse with four rented rooms and a self-contained basement flat.
  • Appellant (Mr. Barker) argued the Ground Floor Room was a self-contained flat, thus not counting towards the HMO occupancy limit.
  • Respondent (Ms. Shokar) applied for a rent repayment order, alleging the property was an unlicensed HMO.
  • The FTT found the property to be an unlicensed HMO and issued a rent repayment order.
  • The appeal challenged the FTT's classification of the Ground Floor Room and its insufficient reasoning regarding occupancy.

Legal Principles

Criteria for identifying a "self-contained flat" under the Housing Act 2004.

Housing Act 2004, section 254(8)

Definition of a House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) under the Housing Act 2004.

Housing Act 2004, section 254(2)

Requirement for occupants to use the property as their only or main residence for it to be considered an HMO.

Housing Act 2004, section 254(2)(c)

Adequacy of reasons in FTT decisions.

Implied in the Upper Tribunal's judgment.

Case law on the 'only or main residence' criteria for HMOs

Opara v Olasemo [2020] UKUT 96 (LC)

Outcomes

Appeal allowed.

The FTT failed to properly apply the statutory definition of a "self-contained flat" and did not provide sufficient reasoning regarding occupancy.

Rent repayment order dismissed.

The Ground Floor Room was deemed a self-contained flat, meaning its occupants did not count towards the HMO occupancy threshold. Even if the rest of the house was an HMO, the occupancy did not reach the licensing threshold.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.