Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

Cocout Animated Island Limited v The Commissioners for HMRC

[2024] UKUT 75 (TCC)
A company (CAIL) tried to get tax relief for investors. The government said a deal with a related company violated the rules, even if it seemed fair. The court agreed, finding the deal was part of the overall plan, so the tax relief was denied.

Key Facts

  • Coconut Animated Island Limited (CAIL) appealed a First-tier Tribunal (FTT) decision refusing SEIS compliance certificates for shares issued between March 19, 2018, and April 5, 2018.
  • HMRC refused due to concerns about the 'risk-to-capital condition', 'qualifying company requirement', and 'disqualifying arrangements'.
  • The FTT dismissed CAIL's appeal, finding that Condition A of the 'disqualifying arrangements' test (section 257 CF(3) Income Tax Act 2007) was met.
  • CAIL argued that CHF Media Group Limited (CHF Group), which was heavily involved in CAIL's operations, was not a 'party to the arrangements' as required for Condition A.
  • The majority of funds raised by CAIL were paid to CHF Entertainment Limited (CHFE), a member of the CHF Group, under a production services agreement (PSA).

Legal Principles

The definition of 'arrangements' in section 257HJ Income Tax Act 2007 is widely drawn but requires 'sufficient unity' between component parts.

Crossland v Hawkins [1961] Ch 537, Jones v Garnett [2007] UKHL 35

'Arrangements' under section 257CF must have a main purpose to secure a qualifying business activity and SEIS relief for investors.

Section 257 CF Income Tax Act 2007

A person is a 'party to the arrangements' if they have sufficient involvement at the relevant time, participating in the arrangements' purpose; this can be broader than direct involvement in devising the arrangements.

Section 257 CF(6) Income Tax Act 2007

Condition A (section 257 CF(3)) is met if, as a result of spending funds from a share issue on a qualifying trade, a majority of the funds are paid to a 'relevant person' during the arrangements.

Section 257 CF(3) Income Tax Act 2007

Outcomes

CAIL's appeal was dismissed.

The Upper Tribunal (UT) agreed with the FTT that Condition A of section 257 CF(3) was met because the arrangements for issuing shares included CHFE, a 'relevant person' due to its significant involvement. The payments to CHFE under the PSA were considered part of the arrangements, even though they were under an arm's length commercial contract.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.