Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

Spectrum Community Health CIC v The Commissioners for HMRC

6 June 2024
[2024] UKUT 162 (TCC)
Upper Tribunal
A healthcare company argued that providing medicine and contraceptives in prisons was a separate taxable service. The court disagreed, saying it was all part of a single, tax-exempt healthcare service provided to the NHS, not the prisoners directly.

Key Facts

  • Spectrum Community Healthcare CIC (Spectrum) provides healthcare services in English prisons under contract with NHS England (NHSE).
  • Spectrum argued that supplies of prescription drugs and contraceptives were separate, taxable supplies, allowing VAT recovery.
  • HMRC and the FTT held that Spectrum made a single exempt composite supply of healthcare, including drugs and contraceptives.
  • Spectrum appealed to the Upper Tribunal (UT) on several grounds.

Legal Principles

Each supply must be regarded as separate and distinct, subject to exceptions for ancillary services, single indivisible economic supplies, or closely related activities sharing exemption.

Article 1(2) and Article 2 of the Principal VAT Directive (PVD); Frenetikexito, CPP, Levob

A single supply has a single tax treatment, even if different VAT rates apply to its components. The predominant element dictates the classification of the whole supply.

Stadion Amsterdam CV, HMRC v Gray and Farrar International, Město Žamberk

Article 132(1)(b) and (c) of the PVD exempt certain healthcare transactions. Exemption (c) is narrower than (b) and does not include 'closely related activities'.

Article 132 PVD

In determining single/multiple supplies, the perspective of the typical consumer is relevant. This is usually the recipient of the supply.

CPP, Everything Everywhere, Frenetikexito

EC v UK and Klinikum decisions clarified the scope of exemption (c), particularly regarding the supply of goods alongside services. Minor goods strictly necessary and not physically and economically dissociable from the service are exempt.

EC v UK, Klinikum Dortmund

Outcomes

Appeal dismissed.

The UT upheld the FTT's finding that Spectrum made a single exempt composite supply of healthcare. The UT rejected Spectrum's arguments based on EC v UK and Klinikum, finding that these cases did not preclude a single supply analysis encompassing drugs and contraceptives. The UT also held that NHSE, as the contractual recipient, was the relevant typical consumer for assessing single vs. multiple supplies.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.