Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

Civic Environmental Systems Ltd v The Commissioners for HMRC

[2023] EWCA Civ 722
A company tried to use losses from one year to reduce its taxes from a previous year. Because they filed the paperwork late, the rules said this couldn't change the taxes they originally owed for the earlier year. They only got back what tax they'd already paid, but couldn't use the rest of their losses to lower their taxes from the earlier year.

Key Facts

  • Civic Environmental Systems Ltd (CES) made a loss in the year ended 30 April 2008 (£444,747).
  • CES claimed to carry back this loss against profits for the year ended 30 April 2007 (£142,039).
  • HMRC later found CES's 2007 profits were understated by £540,000.
  • The FTT and UT held that only £142,039 of the 2008 loss could be set off against the 2007 profits.
  • CES appealed, arguing the entire 2008 loss should be set off.
  • CES's claim to carry back losses was made after the deadline for amending its 2007 tax return.

Legal Principles

Carry-back of losses for corporation tax purposes.

s. 393A Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 (replaced by s. 37 Corporation Tax Act 2010)

A claim to carry back a loss is a claim to carry back the entire loss, to the extent profits are available.

UT decision at [78]

Unused portion of a carried-back loss is carried forward.

s. 393(1) ICTA 1988

Company tax returns and amendments are governed by Schedule 18, Finance Act 1998.

Schedule 18, Finance Act 1998

Claims not included in returns are dealt with under Schedule 1A, Taxes Management Act 1970.

Schedule 1A, Taxes Management Act 1970

The FTT's function on appeal is to decide whether the appellant was overcharged or undercharged by the assessment.

s. 50 TMA 1970

Outcomes

Appeal dismissed.

The UT correctly concluded that CES's claim to carry back the loss was made after the deadline for amending its 2007 return. Therefore, the claim was dealt with under Schedule 1A TMA 1970, not as an amendment to the 2007 return. The FTT correctly did not consider the s. 393A claim in its assessment of the 2007 return, as it was a 'free-standing claim' handled separately under Schedule 1A.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.