R v Duane Walker
[2024] EWCA Crim 772
Compensation orders must be appropriate, considering the offender's means and any evidence/representations.
Section 135, Sentencing Act 2020
Six principles guide compensation orders: offender details means; judge inquires about and makes findings on means; court considers means; order must be realistic; no order if offender lacks means and relies on others; amount and installments considered.
R v York [2019] 1 Cr App R(S) 41
Compensation should benefit victims, not cause further harm; offender's ability to pay determines the order; victim's views should be considered.
Sentencing Council's Compensation Guideline
Court must consider offender's means and ensure sufficient inquiry into their ability to pay within a reasonable timescale.
R v Duane Walker [2024] EWCA 772
Enquiry into offender's means 'almost inevitably involves an enquiry' by the judge of defence counsel, ideally with an indication of provisional figures.
R v Phillips (Mark Adrian) [1988] 10 Cr App R(S) 419
Appeal dismissed regarding compensation for Shelly Taylor.
The £2000 compensation was considered appropriate given Taylor's broken nose and temporary mental anxiety.
Compensation order for PC Keat quashed and reduced to £700.
The original £2000 order was considered manifestly excessive given PC Keat's less serious injury (pain but no bleeding).