W v N-F
[2023] EWFC 302 (B)
Welfare of the child is paramount.
Children Act 1989, Section 1(3)
Holistic evaluation of different options for the children, weighing positives and negatives.
Re TC and JC (children: relocation) [2013] EWHC 292 (Fam)
No presumption in favour of a 'primary carer'.
Re TC and JC (children: relocation) [2013] EWHC 292 (Fam)
Consideration of domestic abuse allegations and potential risk to child welfare.
Practice Direction 12J of the Family Procedure Rules 2010
Children to live with their mother in [City A].
The children are settled in [City A], doing well at school, and further disruption is undesirable. The judge expressed concerns about the father's approach to the case and his potential to involve the children in the conflict. A move to Oxfordshire would represent another disruption and separation from the mother. Shared care is preferable, and is achievable if the father relocates to [City A].
Shared care arrangement with alternating weekends and half the school holidays with the father.
This order allows for regular contact with both parents and aims to balance the needs of both parents and children.
Parents to attend a separated parents information programme.
To aid communication and cooperation between parents.