Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

W v J

24 April 2024
[2024] EWFC 352 (B)
Family Court
A judge overturned a previous order about a child's contact with their father. The original order didn't properly consider the risks and long-term effects on everyone. The case will start again with a new judge to make a better decision about what's best for the child.

Key Facts

  • Appeal against District Judge Harrison's order concerning contact arrangements for child P.
  • Father had previous conviction and notification requirements.
  • Allegations of rape and coercive/controlling behaviour by the father against the mother.
  • Existing contact arrangements were supervised and limited.
  • Mother was unrepresented at the fact-finding hearing.
  • The judge's order was considered a final order.

Legal Principles

Appeal against a final order can only be allowed if the decision is wrong or unjust due to a serious procedural or other irregularity.

Family Procedure Rules 30.12(3)(a) and (b)

Child's welfare is the paramount concern.

Section 1 of the Children Act 1989

Court's responsibility to consider the child's welfare cannot be circumvented for expediency.

Section 1 of the Children Act 1989

Presumption that both parents have a beneficial role in a child's life.

Section 1(2)(a) of the Children Act 1989

Court can utilise Practice Direction 12J for risk assessments.

Practice Direction 12J, paragraph 33(a)

Article 8 rights (respect for private and family life) need to be considered.

Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights

Outcomes

Appeal allowed.

The judge's order was considered incomplete, failing to adequately address risk assessment and the long-term implications for the child and mother, including the father's indefinite notification requirements. The court found insufficient exploration of alternative solutions like psychological assessments.

Order remitted to a different district judge for a welfare hearing.

To ensure a thorough evaluation of the situation, considering the risks and the best interests of the child, with a more comprehensive exploration of alternatives to the current contact arrangement.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.