Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

Keir Stitt v The Information Commissioner & Anor

25 October 2023
[2023] UKFTT 887 (GRC)
First-tier Tribunal
Someone asked for everyone's council tax information. The government said no because it could reveal people's identities. A judge agreed, even though some of the info is available elsewhere, because the law says it's protected from this type of request.

Key Facts

  • Keir Stitt appealed the Information Commissioner's decision that the Valuation Office Agency (VOA) could withhold information under section 44(1)(a) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA).
  • Stitt requested addresses, local authorities, and council tax bands for all properties in England and Wales.
  • The VOA refused, citing section 23(1) of the Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Act 2005 (CRCA), which prevents disclosure of information that could identify an individual.
  • The Commissioner upheld the VOA's refusal, finding that the CRCA restrictions overrode any potential obligations under the Local Government Finance Act 1992 (LGFA).

Legal Principles

Information is exempt under FOIA if its disclosure is prohibited by any enactment.

Freedom of Information Act 2000

Revenue and Customs officials may not disclose information held in connection with their functions, except under specified circumstances.

Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Act 2005

Information prohibited from disclosure under CRCA section 18(1) is exempt under FOIA if it relates to a person and would identify or enable the identification of that person.

Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Act 2005

The Tribunal's jurisdiction in a FOIA appeal is limited to determining whether the Commissioner's decision was in accordance with the law.

Freedom of Information Act 2000

Specific legislation (like the LGFA's public access provisions) may permit disclosure, overriding general prohibitions, but this is determined based on statutory interpretation.

Seward v The Vera Cruz

Outcomes

Appeal dismissed.

The Tribunal found that the requested information was 'revenue and customs information relating to a person' under CRCA, and its disclosure would enable the identification of individuals. The Tribunal held that the LGFA's public access provisions did not override the CRCA's disclosure prohibitions in the context of a FOIA request. The FOIA exemption under section 44(1)(a) therefore applied.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.