Houndgate Wines Limited v The Pensions Regulator
[2023] UKFTT 643 (GRC)
The First-tier Tribunal (FtT) only has the power to determine whether the requirements of reg. 4 of the FP 2012 Regulations were met, not to review HMRC's discretionary refusal of late notifications.
The Executors of David Harrison (Deceased) & Simon Harrison v HMRC [2021] UKUT 0273 (TCC)
Regulation 4 of the FP 2012 Regulations requires notification for FP 2012 to be given by April 5, 2012. There is no provision for accepting late applications due to reasonable excuse.
The Registered Pension Schemes (Lifetime Allowance Transitional Protection) Regulations 2011 SI 2011/1752
The FtT has no judicial review function and cannot supervise HMRC's conduct. Its jurisdiction is limited to the application of tax provisions.
Various cases including *Aspin v Estill* [1987] STC 723, *HMRC v Abdul Noor* [2013] UKUT 071, *Marks & Spencer plc v C & E Comrs* [1999] STC 205
Ignorance of the law is not a defense.
*Holland v German Property Administrator* [1936] 3 All ER 6
Appeal dismissed.
The Appellant's notification was submitted ten years late, failing to meet the requirements of reg. 4 of the FP 2012 Regulations. The FtT lacks jurisdiction to review HMRC's discretionary decision or consider public law arguments.
[2023] UKFTT 643 (GRC)
[2024] UKFTT 926 (TC)
[2023] UKFTT 774 (GRC)
[2024] UKFTT 96 (GRC)
[2023] UKFTT 684 (GRC)