Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

Ann Nilsson & Anor v Mohammad Babar Iqbal & Anor

17 January 2024
[2024] EWHC 49 (Ch)
High Court
A bankrupt and his ex-wife jointly owned a house. The ex-wife claimed the house was hers alone after their divorce. Because she couldn't prove a formal agreement or that she relied on a promise to her detriment, the judge ruled they each own half.

Key Facts

  • Mr. and Mrs. Iqbal were joint tenants of a property, with an express declaration of trust stating equal beneficial ownership.
  • Mrs. Iqbal claimed an oral agreement in 2017, following an Islamic divorce, granted her 100% beneficial ownership.
  • Mr. Iqbal was declared bankrupt in 2020, and the Trustees sought a declaration of beneficial ownership and possession.
  • Mrs. Iqbal's evidence contained inconsistencies regarding the date of a solicitor's meeting and mortgage payments.
  • Mr. Iqbal did not attend the hearing for cross-examination.

Legal Principles

Section 14(2) of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (TOLATA) and section 335A of the Insolvency Act 1986 govern possession claims.

TOLATA and Insolvency Act 1986

An express declaration of trust is conclusive unless varied by subsequent agreement or proprietary estoppel.

Stack v Dowden [2007] 2 AC 432

Proprietary estoppel requires a clear assurance, detrimental reliance, and unconscionability.

Thorner v Major

Outcomes

The Trustees and Mrs. Iqbal are beneficially entitled to the property in equal shares.

The oral agreement lacked the necessary formality to vary the express declaration of trust, and proprietary estoppel was not established due to the lack of clear assurance and conclusive detrimental reliance.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.