Mariusz Szrek & Ors v DIV-ING DOO & Ors
[2024] EWHC 219 (KB)
Permission to serve a claim form outside the jurisdiction requires (1) a serious issue to be tried, (2) a good arguable case that the claim falls within a jurisdictional gateway, and (3) that the English court is the appropriate forum.
Altimo Holdings and Investment Ltd v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd [2011] UKPC 7
A 'good arguable case' means one side has a much better argument on the material available.
Canada Trust Co v Stolzenberg (No. 2) [1998] 1 WLR 547
In determining the appropriate forum, the court considers the interests of all parties and the ends of justice; the burden is on the claimant to show England is clearly the appropriate forum.
Spiliada Maritime Corpn v Cansulex Ltd [1987] AC 460
The court considers whether the claimant acted reasonably in commencing proceedings in England and not in the foreign jurisdiction, even if the claim is time-barred in the foreign jurisdiction.
The Pioneer Container [1994] 2 AC 324
Jurisdictional gateways for service out are defined in Practice Direction 6B, paragraph 3.1.
CPR r. 6.36 and Practice Direction 6B
Claimant's application for permission to serve the claim form on the defendant in Guernsey is allowed.
While Guernsey might be the more appropriate forum, the claimant's inability to afford litigation there due to time bar and funding limitations, coupled with the fact that some jurisdictional gateways were met, justifies allowing the claim in England.
[2024] EWHC 219 (KB)
[2023] EWCA Civ 61
[2024] EWHC 684 (Ch)
[2024] EWHC 1148 (Comm)
[2023] EWCA Civ 1072