Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

Mariusz Szrek & Ors v DIV-ING DOO & Ors

29 January 2024
[2024] EWHC 219 (KB)
High Court
A man got hurt diving in Croatia. He lives in England and wants to sue the Croatian dive company and their insurance company in an English court. The judge said he could because his injuries affected him in England, and it's more practical to have the case there. The judge also gave him more time to serve the lawsuit documents.

Key Facts

  • Mariusz Szrek (First Claimant), a Polish national domiciled in England and Wales, suffered a serious diving injury in Croatia.
  • The Claimants (Mariusz and his Polish family) sued three Croatian defendants: the dive centre operators (DIV-ING D.O.O. and Abyss-Centar) and their insurer (Euroherc Osiguranje D.D.).
  • The injury allegedly resulted from breach of contract and/or negligence by the defendants.
  • The Claimants sought permission to serve the claim form outside the jurisdiction and an extension of time for service.
  • The defendants did not attend the hearing.

Legal Principles

Permission to serve a claim form outside the jurisdiction is granted under CPR 6.36 if grounds in Practice Direction 6B 3.1 apply.

Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) Rule 6.36

For claims in tort, permission is granted if damage was sustained within the jurisdiction (PD 6B 3.1(9)(a)).

Practice Direction 6B 3.1(9)(a)

"Damage" in PD 6B 3.1(9)(a) includes damage which completes a cause of action; pain, suffering, and physical injury suffered sequentially in different jurisdictions can be considered damage sustained within the jurisdiction where the claimant experiences the ongoing consequences.

FS Cairo (Nile Plaza) LLC v Brownlie [2021] UKSC 45, §§81, 83

The claimant must show a reasonable prospect of success and that England and Wales is the proper forum (forum conveniens).

CPR Rule 6.37(3), FS Cairo (Nile Plaza) LLC v Brownlie [2021] UKSC 45, §100, Spilianda Maritime Corp v Cansulex Ltd [1987] A.C. 460

An insurer can be a necessary or proper party to a claim (PD 6B 3.1(3)(a) and (b)).

Practice Direction 6B 3.1(3)(a) and (b)

The court may proceed in the absence of a defendant if reasonable steps to notify them of the hearing have been taken (CPR 23.11(1)).

CPR Rule 23.11(1)

An extension of time for service can be granted under CPR 7.6 if good reason exists.

CPR Rule 7.6

Outcomes

Permission granted to serve the claim form on the defendants outside the jurisdiction.

The claim falls under PD 6B 3.1(9)(a) as damage was sustained within the jurisdiction; the claim has a reasonable prospect of success; and England and Wales is the appropriate forum.

Application for an extension of time for service granted.

Reasonable steps were taken to serve the defendants; the defendants failed to engage; and an 8-month extension is justified given the time required for service in Croatia.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.