The Commissioners for HMRC v Raj Sehgal & Anor
[2024] UKUT 74 (TCC)
In determining the tax treatment of payments from a non-UK company, the character of the payment under the paying company's corporate law is established, then UK tax legislation is applied.
FTT Decision, paragraph [47]
Section 402 ITTOIA 2005 charges income tax on dividends of non-UK resident companies, excluding dividends of a capital nature.
ITTOIA 2005, Section 402
The meaning of "dividend" in tax legislation is determined by its ordinary meaning under English law, considering what the company is permitted to do under its governing law.
First Nationwide v HMRC [2011] STC 1540 (UT), paragraphs [23], [38], [48]
A distribution is considered a dividend if it is made by the same mechanism as a dividend paid from trading profits.
First Nationwide v HMRC, paragraphs [38], [50], [54]
The determination of whether a dividend is of a capital nature is a matter of UK law, focusing on the character of the dividend, not the source of funds.
Case Law Discussion, paragraphs [47], [54], [69]
The 'machinery of distribution' test determines whether a distribution is capital or income. If the mechanism used is for reducing capital (e.g., Part 12 CJL 1991), it is capital; otherwise, it's income.
First Nationwide v HMRC [2012] EWCA Civ 278, paragraphs [55], [59], [68], [69]
The appeal was dismissed.
The distributions were held to be "dividends" under the ordinary meaning of the term in English law, made using the mechanism for distributing profits (Part 17 CJL 1991) and not the mechanism for capital reduction (Part 12 CJL 1991). They were not "dividends of a capital nature" because the distribution mechanism did not involve a reduction of Glencore's capital.
[2024] UKUT 74 (TCC)
[2024] EWCA Civ 813
[2023] EWHC 944 (Ch)
[2024] UKFTT 300 (TC)
[2024] UKUT 23 (TCC)