Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

Catford Supermarket Ltd v The Pensions Regulator

24 May 2024
[2024] UKFTT 420 (GRC)
First-tier Tribunal
A small supermarket didn't file the right paperwork for its pension scheme on time. The government's pension regulator fined them. The supermarket tried to appeal, saying they didn't know about the rules and hadn't received some letters. The court said the supermarket should have known the rules and the fines were fair. The fines stand, but the regulator may offer payment help.

Key Facts

  • Catford Supermarket Ltd (Employer) challenged a fixed penalty notice (FPN) and an escalating penalty notice (EPN) issued by the Pensions Regulator.
  • The FPN (£400) was issued under s 40 of the Pensions Act 2008 for failing to comply with a Compliance Notice.
  • The EPN was issued under s 41 of the Pensions Act 2008 for continued non-compliance, with a daily penalty of £500.
  • The Employer's duties start date was 1 January 2023; the declaration of compliance deadline was 31 May 2023.
  • The Employer failed to submit the declaration, leading to the issuance of the notices.
  • The Employer claimed non-receipt of initial letters and unawareness of the compliance requirement.
  • The Regulator argued proper service and no reasonable excuse for non-compliance.

Legal Principles

Pensions Act 2008 imposes obligations on employers for automatic enrolment, with the Regulator having enforcement powers.

Pensions Act 2008

Employers must provide a Declaration of Compliance within five months of their duties start date.

The Employer’s Duties (Registration and Compliance) Regulations 2010

A person issued with a penalty notice can refer the matter to the Tribunal after a review; the Tribunal decides the appropriate action.

s.44 of the 2008 Act

There is a rebuttable presumption of service when notices are sent to the correct registered address.

Case law (implied)

Lack of awareness of legal obligations is not a reasonable excuse for non-compliance.

Case law (implied)

The Tribunal has no power to reduce prescribed penalties.

Pensions Act 2008 (implied)

Outcomes

The Tribunal dismissed the Employer's references and confirmed both the FPN and EPN.

The notices were properly served; the Employer failed to provide a reasonable excuse for non-compliance; the Tribunal lacks the power to reduce the penalties.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.