Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Court clarifies scope of ‘lawful excuse’ defense in protest-related damage under Criminal Damage Act 1971

Learn about the Attorney General’s Reference on a Point of Law No 1 of 2023 case, which elucidates the 'lawful excuse' defense under section 5(2)(a) of the Criminal Damage Act 1971 in protest-related damage instances, emphasizing the necessity for specific circumstances justifying belief in consent, not broader political ideologies. This analysis offers a crucial legal roadmap for handling similar scenarios in the legal sphere.

[2024] EWCA Crim 243

Appellate Court Reduces Sentence in Attempted Rape Case, Emphasizing Importance of Sentencing Guidelines and Analysis of Dangerousness

Learn about the Michael James Young v R [2024] case insights on criminal sentencing, dangerousness in sexual offenses, and appeal outcomes. Explore key legal principles, court findings, and distinctions between attempts and completed offenses in this concise analysis.

[2024] EWCA Crim 251

Court Upholds Contempt Finding in Disruptive Behavior Case: Analysis of Legal Principles and Human Rights Compatibility

Explore the legal implications and outcomes of the R v John Jordan case regarding contempt of court and its connection to human rights under the ECHR. Understand the threshold of seriousness for contempt, procedural fairness, and the importance of upholding justice in legal proceedings.

[2024] EWCA Crim 229

Court of Appeal Upholds Life Sentence with 27-Year Minimum Term in Richard Lee Norris Murder Case

Explore the complexities of sentencing in murder cases through the examination of Richard Lee Norris v R, emphasizing the significance of aggravating factors, mitigating factors, and the application of legal principles. Understand how the Court of Appeal navigated the balance between these factors to uphold a life sentence with a 27-year minimum term.

[2024] EWCA Crim 68

Court of Appeal Allows Appeal in Bassaragh v R, Replacing 5-Year Custodial Sentence with 2-Year Suspended Sentence

In-depth analysis of the case of Maya Tiger Leelee Bassaragh v R ([2024] EWCA Crim 20), exploring legal principles, key facts, and outcomes of the appeal against a 5-year custodial sentence for possession of a prohibited firearm. The court's considerations on 'exceptional circumstances,' impact of pregnancy on sentencing, personal mitigation, and the final outcome of a 2-year suspended sentence provide valuable insights.

[2024] EWCA Crim 20

Court of Appeal Upholds Decision to Continue Trial Without Jury After Jury Tampering

Discover the legal insights from Shahid Mohammad v Palvaan Islaam case on handling jury tampering issues, including the decision to proceed without a jury. Understand the key principles outlined and the Court of Appeal's stance on maintaining trial integrity.

[2024] EWCA Crim 34

Court of Appeal Affirms Mens Rea Requirement in Money Laundering Case Under POCA POCA with Emphasis on Fair Trial Procedures

Court of Appeal reviews Jacob Gross v R case on money laundering offences under POCA. Analysis covers legal elements, mens rea, and procedural impacts on trial fairness. Gross's conviction upheld after appeal dismissal.

[2024] EWCA Crim 21

Court of Appeal Emphasizes Freedom of Expression in Quashing Conviction in R v Thomas Casserly Case

Explore the legal intricacies of R v Thomas Casserly, a case shaping the boundaries of freedom of expression and 'grossly offensive' communication under the Malicious Communications Act. Understand the pivotal role of political speech and the nuanced intent required for conviction.

[2024] EWCA Crim 25

Court of Appeal Reduces Sentence in Drug Offense Case: Balancing Punishment with Individual Circumstances.

Discover the key legal principles and outcomes of R v Kemani Dunn's appeal case concerning drug offenses in the UK. Explore the Court's nuanced approach to sentencing and the balance between punishment and mitigating circumstances.

[2024] EWCA Crim 51

Court of Appeal Rejects Arguments for Appeal Against Conviction in R v AUV [2024] - Legal Principles on Indictments, Expert Evidence, and Trial Counsel Critically Evaluated

R v AUV [2024] EWCA Crim 11: Key legal principles on evidence admissibility, trial counsel conduct, and fresh evidence in a cruelty and sexual assault case. The Court of Appeal's detailed analysis and outcomes in dismissing appeal grounds.

[2024] EWCA Crim 11

Court of Appeal Reduces Sentence in R v Gary Cushen Due to Double Counting and Proportionality

Learn about the key legal principles and outcomes of the case R v Gary Cushen [2024] EWCA Crim 38 in this insightful analysis. Understanding sentencing guidelines, proportionality, and double counting is crucial for legal professionals.

[2024] EWCA Crim 38

EWCA Dismisses Appeal Against Custodial Sentence for Rape and Coercive Behavior

In-depth analysis of the R v Henry Smith case appeal, delving into key facts, legal principles, outcomes, and the dismissal decision by the EWCA. Get insights into sentencing, guilty plea credit, aggravating factors, and the totality principle.

[2024] EWCA Crim 30

Court of Appeal Dismisses Appeal in R v Nicholas Ian Roddis, Upholding Strict Sentencing Approach for Terrorism Notification Offences

Read about the Court of Appeal's decision on sentencing and legal principles in R v Nicholas Ian Roddis. Learn how severity of terrorism notification offences and totality in sentencing were key factors discussed.

[2024] EWCA Crim 35

R v Shakeel Janjua: Court of Appeal Addresses Failure to Explain Sentencing Calculations & Importance of Totality Guideline

Discover the impact of the *R v Shakeel Janjua* case on sentencing principles. Learn about explanations behind sentence calculations, the Totality Guideline, credit for guilty pleas, and adjustments made following the appeal.

[2024] EWCA Crim 32

Court of Appeal Modifies Sentences in R v Steven Arthur Connolly for Possession of a Bladed Article and Affray: Key Legal Principles Explained

Discover the key legal principles and outcomes of the R v Steven Arthur Connolly appeal case involving possession of a bladed article and affray sentencing. Understand the application of sentencing guidelines, the totality principle, consideration of previous convictions, and adjustments made by the Court of Appeal.

[2024] EWCA Crim 31

EWCA Crim Reduces Custodial Sentence in R v Tommy Robinson Case Based on Mitigation Factors

The R v Tommy Robinson case highlights the impact of personal circumstances on sentencing in drug offense cases. Learn how genuine remorse and proactive rehabilitation efforts led to a reduced sentence.

[2024] EWCA Crim 36

Court of Appeal Upholds Sentences in R v Vito di Marco & Anor, Emphasizing Assessment of Harm and Dangerousness

Experience the detailed legal analysis of R v Vito di Marco & Anor as this article explores the Court of Appeal's approach to sentencing in the case of attempted murder. Discover the legal principles applied and how the court evaluated harm, dangerousness, and the reasoning behind the imposed sentences. Gain insights into the factors influencing the decision-making process and the outcome of the appeal.

[2024] EWCA Crim 19

Court of Appeal Examines Sentencing Errors and Dangerousness in R v Colin Barker Case: Key Issues Explored

Discover the implications of R v Colin Barker, a case shedding light on sentencing errors and principles concerning dangerousness and extended sentences. Uncover key facts, legal principles, and outcomes in this insightful analysis.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1633

Court of Appeal Affirms Conviction in R v Max Perry Manus Prior Appeal, Highlighting Importance of Evidence Quality and Legal Representation

In the appellate judgement of R v Max Perry Manus Prior [2023] EWCA Crim 1651, the Court of Appeal thoroughly examines legal principles governing criminal appeals, evidence evaluation, legal representation, and arrest procedures. Learn about the court's systematic analysis of the applicant's grounds of appeal and the critical importance of evidence quality and procedural adherence in securing fair trials.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1651

Court of Appeal Increases Sentence in R v Redi Gjoni for Drug Trafficking Offenses

Analyzing the sentencing principles and outcomes in R v Redi Gjoni, this article explores the implications of concurrent sentencing for drug trafficking offenses, addressing the significance of individualized sentences reflecting separate criminality.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1634

Court of Appeal upholds Criminal Behaviour Order in R v Soul Kwake-Ampomah for attempted robbery conviction

Dissecting the R v Soul Kwake-Ampomah case: Learn about the Court of Appeal's ruling on a Criminal Behaviour Order (CBO) and the legal principles applied in this article.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1638

Court Denies Appeal in Autism Consent Case Under Sexual Offences Act 2003

Discover the legal intricacies surrounding a defendant's autism and its impact on consent beliefs in the analysis of Robin Edward Jacobs v R [2023] EWCA Crim 1503. Explore how the Court of Appeal scrutinizes the intersection of autism, consent, and reasonable belief while upholding objective standards in determining consent reasonableness.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1503

Court of Appeal Increases Sentence in R v Jonathan Da Silva Due to Undue Leniency

Discover the legal intricacies of the R v Jonathan Da Silva case involving an appeal for a sentence review under the Criminal Justice Act 1988. Explore the justification for the Court's decision to impose a stricter sanction on the offender.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1624

R v Michael McCafferty: Appeals Court Upholds Convictions Despite Challenges to Inadmissible Evidence and Jury Verdict Consistency

Explore the Court of Appeal's decision in R v Michael McCafferty [2023] EWCA Crim 1650, addressing issues of inadmissible evidence, jury verdict analysis, cross-admissibility, and the cumulative impact on sexual offence cases. Understand the significance of proper judicial instructions and the impact on trial fairness.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1650

Court of Appeal Clarifies Composition of Court Martial Board for Former Serviceman: R v Muhammad Tariq Bhoyroo

In the case of R v Muhammad Tariq Bhoyroo, the Court of Appeal clarified key procedural issues concerning the composition of the Court Martial Board and the role of civilian and officer members in trials under Service law.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1625

Court of Appeal Upholds Custodial Sentences for Young Offenders in Gang-Related GBH Case

Discover the key legal principles surrounding the sentencing of young offenders in the R v ART & Anor case, analyzing the implications of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 and the Sentencing Guideline for causing grievous bodily harm with intent. Explore the court's application of anonymity protocols and the principle of rehabilitation over punishment for minors under UK law.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1680

Court Examines Procedural and Substantive Requirements for Restraining Orders Post-Acquittal in R v Gino Mari

Discover the key legal principles and outcomes in the R v Gino Mari case regarding restraining orders post-acquittal. Learn about the civil nature of these orders, the standard of necessity, compliance with Criminal Procedure Rules, and the role of family court in such matters. Explore the appellate judgment and its impact on familial relationships.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1631

R v Nugent: Defining Firearms, Mandatory Minimum Sentences, and Retrospective Application

Unlock the legal intricacies behind R v Raymond Frederick Nugent's Firearms Act 1968 case, from defining firearms to mandatory minimum sentences. Delve into the retrospective application of laws and the Court of Appeal's nuanced sentencing considerations.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1649

Court of Appeal Clarifies Interpretation of Fraud Act 2006 in David Ames v R Case

Unlock insights into the interpretation of the Fraud Act 2006 and sentencing principles in the landmark case of David Ames v R. Explore the court's guidance on proving intent under section 4(1)(c) and the justification of consecutive sentences in serious fraud cases. Ideal for legal professionals navigating fraud offences and jury directives in the UK.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1463

Court of Appeal Upholds Conviction in Khan Abdul v R, Addressing Disclosure Failings and Jury Misconduct

In the case of Kahn Abdul v R, the Court of Appeal analyzed claims of improper disclosure and jury misconduct in a criminal conviction appeal. Legal principles on disclosure obligations and jury confidentiality were upheld, leading to the dismissal of appeal grounds. Read more about this case's critical implications on criminal procedure and jury conduct in the UK legal system.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1477

Key Issue in Khan Abdul v R: Balancing Jury Confidentiality and Fair Trial Concerns

Uncover key legal principles and outcomes from Khan Abdul v R case appeal. Learn about issues such as disclosure obligations, jury conduct, and the threshold for post-conviction investigations. Gain insights into the rigorous analysis by the Court of Appeal on fairness and integrity in criminal trials.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1477

Key Issue in R v Jonathan Porter & Anor: Proof of Criminal Property Essential for Money Laundering Convictions

Discover key insights from the R v Jonathan Porter & Anor case on money laundering offenses under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. Learn about the legal requirements for proving cash as criminal property and the importance of establishing a predicate offense. Gain valuable clarity on the evidentiary standards essential for convictions in money laundering cases.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1485

Court of Appeal Upholds Terrorism Act 2006 Convictions in R v Kashif Riaz & Anor [2023] Case

In-depth analysis of R v Kashif Riaz & Anor case under the Terrorism Act 2006 by the Court of Appeal Criminal Division. Examines sufficiency of evidence, ECHR rights, and trial fairness. Appeals denied, convictions upheld.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1686

Court of Appeal Reproaches Misapplication of Sentencing Guidelines in R v Dylan Joshua Benjamin Marshall

Learn about the significant judgment in *R v Dylan Joshua Benjamin Marshall* focusing on indecent images of children sentencing principles. Find key legal principles applied, the outcome of the case, and the importance of proper offense categorization for just sentencing.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1640

Court of Appeal Upholds Sentence in R v Hamzah Ali Hameed Drug Offence Appeal

Discover the intricacies of *R v Hamzah Ali Hameed* [2023] EWCA Crim 1611 in this detailed analysis. Explore the Court of Appeal's decision on drug offences, sentencing guidelines, suspended sentences, and the impact of fresh evidence. Uncover the insightful legal principles that guided the judgment and the significance of rigor in sentencing considerations.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1611

Court of Appeal Refuses Appeal in R v Khayam Khurshid Based on Lack of Credible Fresh Evidence

In the R v Khayam Khurshid case, the Court of Appeal refused permission to appeal against a conviction for murder and firearm possession. The decision highlights the importance of credible evidence and the interests of justice in conviction appeals.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1687

Appellate Court Emphasizes Mitigating Factors in Sentencing for Offences Causing Serious Child Injury

Analyze the Court of Appeal Criminal Division's judgment in R v Lewis Richard John Romanis, focusing on sentencing considerations for serious child injury offenses. Learn about mitigating factors, new sentencing guidelines, and the impact of mental disorders on sentencing decisions.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1612

Clarity in Sentencing: R v WK Case Illustrates Importance of Judicial Precision in Sentence Modifications

Learn about the significance of precise legal sentencing and order adjustments post-appeal in the R v WK case. Uncover the key legal principles and outcomes of this important judgment by the Court of Appeal Criminal Division.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1678

Court of Appeal Examines Severity of Harm and Mitigating Factors in R v Chris Warren Sentencing Appeal

Discover the key legal principles and outcomes of the appellate case R v Chris Warren ([2023] EWCA Crim 1645), shedding light on sentencing considerations in sexual assault cases. Understanding the severity of harm, mitigating factors, and the sequencing of sentencing guidelines is crucial for a fair and proportionate judicial decision.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1645

Court of Appeal Orders Retrial in R v Harry Turner: Key Issue of Loss of Control Defence Examined

Discover the insights from R v Harry Turner on the partial defence of loss of control in murder cases. Uncover the legal principles, the court's analysis, and the outcomes that led to the original conviction being quashed and a retrial ordered.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1626

Sentencing Guidelines and Dangerousness Assessment Upheld in R v Jean-Claude Placide Appeal

Discover the legal nuances and sentencing principles in the R v Jean-Claude Placide [2023] EWCA Crim 1636 case. Understand the application of sentencing guidelines, categorization of offenses, and assessment of offender dangerousness by the Court of Appeal.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1636

Court of Appeal Affirms Convictions in R v Damien Dunstuan: Highlighting Role of Bad Character Evidence and Judicial Discretion

Discover the legal implications of the R v Damien Dunstuan case on the admissibility of bad character evidence and judicial discretion in criminal proceedings. Understand how past convictions were crucial in correcting a defendant's false impression and how the court upheld the convictions for aggravated burglary and unlawful wounding.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1632

Court of Appeal Upholds Conviction and Sentence in R v Michael Stainer, Emphasizing Strict Standards for Financial Conduct and Fraud Appeals

In the case of R v Michael Stainer, the Court of Appeal reaffirms legal obligations regarding fraud and director responsibilities. The judgment delves into the principles of criminal fraud, duty of disclosure, and sentencing guidelines for revenue fraud cases, dismissing the appeal against conviction and sentence. A must-read for insights into financial conduct legalities and appeal processes.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1656

Court Rejects Appeal Against Confiscation Order in R v Miroslav Pesko Due to Improper Grounds

Learn about the legal complexities and outcomes of R v Miroslav Pesko's confiscation case. Delve into key legal principles and the court's refusal of the appeal application.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1568

Court Upholds Conviction in Ali v R Case, Emphasizing High Threshold for Misconduct in Public Office

A recent judgment in Mohammed Adnan Ali v R [2023] EWCA Crim 1464 sheds light on the legal complexities surrounding misconduct in public office and sexual assault by a police constable. Key insights include the elements of 'acting as such' and the seriousness threshold in determining criminality. The court upheld the conviction but altered the sentence, underscoring the gravity of the offense and public trust implications.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1464

Court Upholds Sentences in Catalytic Converter Theft Conspiracy Appeal

Learn about sentencing guidelines and legal principles applied in the R v Barney Joyce & Anor case involving a conspiracy to steal from motor vehicles. Discover key facts, outcomes, and insights on mitigating and aggravating factors in determining sentencing decisions.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1512

Court of Appeal Upholds Sentence in R v Mark Green: Key Issue on Culpability and Guilty Plea Credit Evaluated

Discover the key legal principles and judicial reasoning behind the Court of Appeal's dismissal of the appeal in R v Mark Green, a case involving a fatal single-punch altercation. Uncover insights on culpability categorization, credit for guilty pleas, and the impact of precedents on sentencing outcomes.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1567

Court of Appeal Addresses Admissibility of Anonymous Hearsay Evidence and Sentencing Provisions for Young Offenders in R v Kyi-Riece Sylvester

R v Kyi-Riece Sylvester Case Analysis: Explore key legal principles on hearsay evidence admissibility and sentencing provisions for young offenders. Gain insights from the Court of Appeal's ruling.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1546

Court upholds extended sentence in R v Callen Chandler-Jones for multiple counts of rape

Discover the key legal principles and outcomes in R v Callen Chandler-Jones, a case highlighting sentencing for sexual offences in the UK. Learn about the extended sentence imposed, sentencing guidelines, dangerousness considerations, guilty plea credit, and the dismissal of the appeal.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1539

Court of Appeal Upholds Sentence for Prison Smuggling in R v Jordan Murray

Discover the legal insights into sentencing for prison smuggling in the *R v Jordan Murray* case. Unpack key details, including sentencing principles, significant factors considered, and the court's final decision on the appeal application.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1511

Court of Appeal reduces custodial sentence in R v Kyle Hodson appeal, emphasizes individual mitigating factors.

R v Kyle Hodson: A legal analysis of dangerous driving sentencing guidelines, appeal outcome, and the balance between mitigating factors and custodial sentences.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1510

Court of Appeal Increases Sentence in R v Robert Evans Due to Undue Leniency and Offender's Dangerousness

Discover the pivotal legal issues in R v Robert Evans [2023] EWCA Crim 1520 with the Court of Appeal reassessing an unduly lenient sentence, focusing on sentencing guidelines, offender dangerousness assessment, and extended determinate sentences.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1520

Court Corrects Sentencing Errors in R v Terrance David Bailey: Emphasizes Personal Mitigation and Totality Guideline

Discover how the R v Terrance David Bailey case sheds light on sentencing principles, total sentence reduction, and the Totality Guideline. Uncover the impact on offender sentences and the crucial role of personal mitigation in achieving just outcomes.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1542

Court of Appeal Analyzes Application of Loss of Control Defense in Murder Case, Impacts Sentencing Decisions

Analyze the Court of Appeal case of Jaden Drake & Anor v R on loss of control defense, evidence evaluation, and sentencing considerations for murder in the context of drug dealing. Understand the impact of legal principles on outcomes and sentencing.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1454

Court of Appeal Examines Youth Sentencing Principles in R v Daniel Kovalkov: Reconsidering Custodial Sentences for Young Offenders Involved in Drugs and Violence

Explore the R v Daniel Kovalkov case dissecting sentencing principles for young offenders in drug supply and violent crimes. The analysis delves into the lawful application of guidelines, considerations for youth rehabilitation, and revisiting sentencing forms.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1509

Court of Appeal denies extension for appeal in R v Deepankar Dixit, focusing on indictment and joint enterprise principles

Explore the legal complexities of R v Deepankar Dixit as the Court of Appeal Criminal Division delves into issues of indictments, joint enterprise, and extensions for appeal in a false accounting case, offering key insights for legal practitioners and law students.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1519

Court of Appeal Reaffirms Statutory Minimum Sentence and Totality Principle in R v Malik Douglas Appeal

Discover the key legal principles addressed in the court appeal of R v Malik Douglas regarding statutory minimum sentences, guilty plea credit, and the totality principle for sentencing multiple offenses. Explore how the Court of Appeal balanced these factors to ensure fairness and adherence to legal standards.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1476

Court of Appeal Upholds Sentence in R v Przemyslaw Libert for Firearms, Drug, and Money Laundering Offences

Learn about the Court of Appeal's analysis in the R v Przemyslaw Libert case, focusing on firearms, drug offenses, and money laundering. Explore legal principles applied and the outcomes, providing insights into sentencing guidelines and the Totality principle.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1556

Court of Appeal Upholds Sentence in R v Raymond Alexander McLaren for Serious Offense of Wounding with Intent

Explore the legal analysis of the R v Raymond Alexander McLaren case by the Court of Appeal of England and Wales. Review the sentencing guidelines, aggravating and mitigating factors considered, and the outcome of the appeal challenging the initial sentence of seven years' imprisonment.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1555

Court Upholds Life Sentence for Applicant in Murder and Robbery Case: Emphasizes Intent, Aggravating Factors, and Totality in Sentencing

Explore the legal principles surrounding sentencing in murder cases through the R v Romain Lapierre appeal, focusing on intent, aggravating factors, and the doctrine of totality. Understand the impact of personal circumstances on sentencing outcomes.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1543

R v Thomas Moore: Court of Appeal Addresses Improper Judicial Pressure on Guilty Pleas

Explore the landmark case of R v Thomas Moore [2023] EWCA Crim 1685, highlighting key legal principles on guilty pleas, judicial pressure, and plea voluntariness. Discover how the Court of Appeal scrutinized plea circumstances, emphasizing the importance of maintaining defendant autonomy and fair trial rights in the criminal justice system.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1685

Court of Appeal Addresses Sentencing of Young Offenders in Joint Enterprise Murder - R v Alfie Ferguson & Ors

Discover the key principles and considerations revealed in the R v Alfie Ferguson & Ors case, shedding light on youth offender sentencing, joint enterprise in crimes, and the impact of remorse on sentencing. Gain insights into the court's rationale for upholding the sentences imposed, emphasizing the significance of individual roles and age-related factors in judicial decisions.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1569

R v Darren Joseph Midgley: Court of Appeal Upholds 15-Year Sentence for Drug Conspiracy

Explore the R v Darren Joseph Midgley case where the Court of Appeal upheld a sentence for conspiracy to supply cocaine, emphasizing sentencing guidelines, mitigation factors, and legal representation challenges.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1635

Court of Appeal Replaces Lenient Sentence with Custodial Terms for Young Offender Valencia in Multiple Serious Crimes Case

Learn about the R v Freddie Alexander Valencia case where the Court of Appeal imposed concurrent sentences on a young offender for serious crimes. Explore the legal principles and outcomes of this judgment.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1683

Climate Wiseman v R: Court of Appeal Upholds Fraud Conviction, Addresses Jury Directions and Costs Order

Learn about the Court of Appeal decision in Climate Wiseman v R, focusing on fraud representation under the Fraud Act 2006 and legal principles on erroneous information, jury directions, and costs orders in criminal proceedings.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1363

Court of Appeal Adjusts Driving Disqualification Period to Account for Time Spent on Remand

Calvin James Grant v R: Learn about the Court of Appeal's adjustment of a driving disqualification period in light of time spent on remand. Understand the legal principles and outcomes in this case.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1414

Court of Appeal Affirms Totality Principle and Role Categorization in Drug Conspiracy Sentencing Appeals

Dive into the R v Matthew Wharlow & Anor case analysis, focusing on drug conspiracy sentencing appeals that touched on key legal principles like totality, role categorization, and concurrent vs. consecutive sentences. Learn how the court's decisions influenced the outcomes in this comprehensive legal study.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1613

Court of Appeal Critically Assesses Sentencing Guidelines in R v Oleksandr Hranatyr [2023] EWCA Crim 1684

Analyze the R v Oleksandr Hranatyr case appeal against a drug offense sentence, examining sentencing principles, key facts, and outcomes. Understand the Court of Appeal's scrutiny of Sentencing Guidelines to adjust the custodial sentence for the appellant, emphasizing the importance of legal principles and balanced judgments in drug-related cases.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1684

Court of Appeal Affirms Limited Impact of Post-sentencing Behavior in Sentence Appeals

Justas Bieksa v R: Explore sentencing principles, grounds for appeal, and post-sentencing conduct impact analyzed in this pivotal Court of Appeal ruling. Understand why exemplary behavior post-sentencing may not alter initial sentences.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1405

Court of Appeal Clarifies Key Legal Principles in Brennand v R Appeal Involving Indecent Assault and Cruelty Convictions

Explore the legal nuances of the Grahame Brennand v R case, tackling issues of cross-admissibility, jury directions, burden of proof, and more. Gain insights from the Court of Appeal's decisions in this pivotal case.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1384

Court Clarifies Criteria for Reduced Sentences Based on Post-Sentencing Assistance: R v BHR & Anor

Explore the case of R v BHR & Anor [2023] EWCA Crim 1622, delving into the requirements for offenders seeking sentence reductions post-sentencing. Unravel the legal principles and outcomes tied to providing assistance to law enforcement authorities. Gain insights into the Court's stance on this pivotal legal matter.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1622

Appellate Court Dismisses Fresh Evidence Appeal in Mohammed Sajid v R Case, Upholding Conviction Integrity

Explore the crucial legal considerations in the Mohammed Sajid v R case concerning appeals, fresh evidence, and convictions. Understand the court's meticulous assessment of new evidence's credibility and its impact on the conviction's safety. Discover the stringent standards applied by the appellate court in affirming trial decisions and the significance of trustworthy evidence in challenging convictions.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1346

Court of Appeal Upholds Conviction in R v Rashid Mahmood, Highlighting Importance of Legal Representation and Counsel's Advice on Testifying

Discover the key insights from the Court of Appeal case R v Rashid Mahmood [2023] EWCA Crim 1358 regarding legal representation, advice on testifying, and the impact on trial fairness, including outcomes and implications for future cases.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1358

Appeal against Life Sentence for Murder Explores Joint Enterprise and Individual Culpability

Explore the intricate legal principles and outcomes in the Court of Appeal case R v Joshua James Cameron Prescott [2023] EWCA Crim 1437, a significant judgment on sentencing guidelines and joint enterprise in murder cases in the UK.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1437

Appeal Granted in R v Nathan Schultz: Analysis of Sentence for Death by Dangerous Driving

Discover the legal intricacies of R v Nathan Schultz's appeal on a dangerous driving case. Dive into the granted permission for the sentence appeal and explore the critical legal principles highlighted, shedding light on the upcoming detailed review process.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1335

Appeal in R v Scott Marsden Highlights Flawed Application of Section 34 Adverse Inferences

Explore the legal intricacies of Scott Marsden's successful appeal against an assault conviction in a case examining the application of section 34 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. Understand the significance of accurate judicial direction and the implications for fair trials in cases involving adverse inferences from pre-charge silence.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1610

Court of Appeal Upholds Fairness of Trial Judge's Summing-up in Allen Brutnell v R Decisio

Discover crucial insights from the Allen Brutnell v R case, exploring the balance of a judge's summing-up in criminal trials and the impact on a fair trial. Get clarity on legal principles, including the right to a fair trial and permissible judicial commentary, crucial for understanding the nuances of trial proceedings. Gain valuable perspectives on the upheld fair trial decision and the significance of maintaining balance and impartiality in legal proceedings.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1331

Court Upholds Sentence in R v Jack Kenneth Darren Lomas - Applying Sentencing Principles for Dangerous Driving Offences

Discover the impact of R v Jack Kenneth Darren Lomas [2023] EWCA Crim 1436, focusing on sentencing principles, aggravating factors, and changes in parole eligibility for dangerous driving offences. Understand how this judicial decision sets a precedent for severe driving infractions.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1436

Court Upholds Life Sentence for Thomas Cashman in Murder Case

Learn about the conviction and sentencing of Thomas Cashman in the notable case of Cashman v R, where he was convicted of murder and attempted murder. The court's decision, legal principles applied, and outcome of the case illustrates the gravity of the offenses and the meticulous approach to justice in sentencing.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1349

Court of Appeal Increases Sentence in R v Harry Jones for Unduly Lenient GBH Conviction

"The Court of Appeal's judgment in R v Harry Jones highlights the application of sentencing guidelines, culpability assessment, and unduly lenient sentences, leading to a significant increase in the original prison term. Learn about key legal discussions and outcomes here."

[2023] EWCA Crim 1443

Judicial Discretion Upheld in Sentencing Reductions for Informers: Analysis of Adam Royle & Ors v R Case Law

Learn about the legal principles surrounding sentence reductions for informers in Adam Royle & Ors v R case, where the Court of Appeal examined issues related to incentivizing cooperation with law enforcement. Understand factors influencing reduction decisions and the significance of a fact-specific approach in determining sentence reductions.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1311

Court of Appeal Quashes Convictions in ADG & Anor v R Due to Error in Statutory Defence Instruction

Discover the court's analysis of ADG & Anor v R under the Modern Slavery Act 2015 in this case review. Learn about the incorrect jury directions, implications for minors' defence, and the quashing of convictions for drug-related charges.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1309

Failure of Disclosure in R v Darren Dawson Appeal Highlights Importance of Proper Identification Procedures and Disclosure in Criminal Trials

Appeal against conviction in R v Darren Dawson (EWCA Crim 1408) due to undisclosed negative identification procedure. Case highlights importance of proper disclosure, identification evidence, and implications of defendant's silence. Court upholds conviction citing overwhelming evidence despite procedural errors.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1408

Court of Appeal Addresses Sentences for County Lines Drug Operation Exploiting Children Under Modern Slavery Act

Learn about the R v Josh Ethan Mason & Ors case involving county lines drug operation and modern slavery offences. Understand how the Court of Appeal addressed sentencing and the application of legal principles.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1540

Court of Appeal Upholds Extended Sentences for Young Offender with Mental Health Conditions in R v Jodell Solomon

Learn about the R v Jodell Solomon case where the Court of Appeal examined sentencing principles for young offenders with mental health conditions. Understand the importance of the totality principle, extended sentences, and jurisdictional errors in this detailed legal analysis.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1375

Sentencing Principles in Large-Scale Drug Operation: Christopher Kirkby v R Case Analysis

Discover sentencing principles in large-scale drug cases through this insightful analysis of the Christopher Kirkby v R case. Explore key topics like criminal operations scale, potential harm of drugs, and the totality principle in sentencing.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1293

Court of Appeal Substitutes Harsh Sentence with Suspended Sentence in Drug-Related Offence Appeal

Discover the key legal principles and outcomes of the R v Lamar Barley case, analyzing the Court of Appeal's decision to substitute a suspended sentence for a drug-related offence. Explore the impact of incarceration on rehabilitation for young offenders with troubled backgrounds.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1514

Court emphasizes legal standards in tax evasion case: R v Lynne Henry, EWCA-Criminal 1359

Discover the legal intricacies of tax evasion in the UK through the case of R v Lynne Henry. Explore the principles of guilty pleas, sentencing guidelines, and tax regulations highlighted by the England and Wales Court of Appeal's judgment.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1359

English Court's Jurisdiction Over Controlling or Coercive Behaviour Abroad: R v Norbert Stari Case Analysis

Learn about the jurisdictional complexities in R v Norbert Stari [2023] EWCA Crim 1409 and the English court's interpretation of the Serious Crime Act 2015, examining the control and coercive behavior with transnational elements within the UK legal system.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1409

Court of Appeal Reduces Minimum Term in McSweeney Murder Case After Guilty Plea Credit Reevaluation

Explore the detailed legal analysis in the case of Jordan McSweeney v R, where the Court of Appeal reviews the sentencing principles under the Sentencing Act 2020, evaluates aggravating and mitigating factors, and determines a reduced minimum term for the murder conviction.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1250

Court of Appeal Quashes Convictions in R v Aaron Hewson Due to Unbalanced Summing-Up

Explore the R v Aaron Hewson case analysis by the Court of Appeal, focusing on judicial summing-up fairness and its impact on safety of convictions for sexual offences. Important legal principles and outcomes highlighted for insightful reflection.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1657

Court of Appeal Revises Sentence for Offender with Mental Health Disorder in R v Joseph Hawkridge546510.

Discover the legal implications of R v Joseph Hawkridge, a case that analyzes sentencing considerations for individuals with mental disorders. Delve into the importance of mental health disposals and the court's duty to assess the impact of sentences on offenders' conditions.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1288

Admissibility of Identification Evidence in Criminal Proceedings Highlighted in R v William Bogie [2023] EWCA Crim 1280

Learn about R v William Bogie [2023] EWCA Crim 1280 and the admissibility of identification evidence in criminal proceedings. Explore the impact of police breaches of PACE Code D on trial fairness and the court's considerations on evidence sufficiency and fairness to ensure a fair trial process.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1280

Court of Appeal Scrutinizes Sentence Appeal in Rape Case, Quashes Dangerousness Finding

In R v HLN [2023] EWCA Crim 1356, the Court of Appeal reviewed an appeal involving sexual offenses, sentencing, and dangerousness. Learn about legal principles in determining sentences, recognizing vulnerability, abuse of trust, assessing dangerousness, and applying the totality principle.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1356

Appellate Court Examines Principles of Sentencing in Firearms Offence Case

Explore the nuances of consecutive vs concurrent sentencing and the impact of guilty pleas on statutory minimum sentences in the appellate case of R v Paul Anthony Glynn. Understand the principles guiding sentencing in firearms offences and the legal implications for UK legal professionals.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1494

Court of Appeal Rules against Awarding Costs from Central Funds in Gray v R Case

Explore the recent legal decision in Kieran Gray v R [2023], shedding light on the Court of Appeal's jurisdiction to award costs from central funds post a refused leave to appeal against sentence. Delve into the key facts, legal principles, outcomes, and the careful considerations shaping this pivotal case.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1285

Appellate Court Adjusts Excessive Sentence in Dangerous Dogs Act Case

Explore the R v Paul Croft case and its sentencing implications under the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991. Uncover insights on culpability, harm factors, and the application of sentencing guidelines within this legal analysis.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1538

Court of Appeal Upholds Sentence for Serious Sexual Offences Against Children in R v AJ

The case of R v AJ explores sentencing principles in sexual offence cases involving children, highlighting the Court's consideration of aggravating factors, dangerousness assessment, and the application of relevant guidelines. Learn about the legal insights and outcomes of the appeal in this detailed analysis.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1345

Court of Appeal Affirms Key Sentencing Principles in R v Ishmail Zafar Case

Discover key legal principles and outcomes in the Court of Appeal case of R v Ishmail Zafar ([2023] EWCA Crim 1305), discussing sentencing guidelines, aggravating factors, mitigating factors, totality principle, and statutory limitations on sentencing powers.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1305

Court Upholds Confiscation Order in R v Josephine Iyamu: Key Issue Surrounding Proceeds of Crime Act Assumptions in Human Trafficking Case

R v Josephine Iyamu: Analysis of a Confiscation Order under POCA 2002 - Explore the legal complexities and outcomes of a case involving human trafficking proceeds and challenges to a confiscation order. Understanding the stringent requirements defendants must meet to oppose such orders.

[2024] EWCA Crim 8

Court of Appeal Confirms Sentencing Guidelines and Application of Totality Principle in R v Liam Brown Case

Gain insights into the application of criminal law principles in the R v Liam Brown case, including witness intimidation, assault, and harassment. Understand the sentencing framework, the totality principle, and the impact of culpability and harm on sentencing decisions.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1342

Court of Appeal Considers Role and Vulnerability of Offender in Drug Sentencing

Explore the legal principles and outcomes of the R v Raqab Mohammed case, analyzing sentencing considerations for drug offenses involving young and vulnerable offenders. Understand the Court's approach to factors like age, coercion, and role assessment in determining appropriate sentences.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1325

Appellate Decision in BNE v R Sheds Light on Evidence Disclosure and Public Interest Immunity in Decoy Operations

Explore the legal complexities of evidence disclosure and Public Interest Immunity in the recent appellate case BNE v R [2023] EWCA Crim 1242. Understand the implications of non-disclosure on convictions related to sexual communication offenses in decoy operations and the need for balanced procedural fairness in similar cases moving forward.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1242

Analysis of R v Jamie Wilder: Legal Principles and Justification of Life Sentence

In the case of R v Jamie Wilder [2023] EWCA Crim 1295, the Court of Appeal upheld the life sentence imposed on the appellant, emphasizing the legal principles surrounding dangerousness assessment and the justification for life sentences under the Sentencing Code.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1295

Court of Appeal Increases Sentencing for Dangerous Driving to Reflect Updated Guidelines

Discover how the R v Syed Minhaz Ahmed case addresses sentencing guidelines and unduly lenient sentences in dangerous driving cases. Explore key legal principles, outcomes, and the importance of judicial adherence to current guidelines for just sentencing.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1537

EWCA Upholds Sentence in R v Adil Riaz Appeal, Emphasizing Principle of Totality and Reduction for Guilty Pleas

Discover the key legal principles and outcomes of the R v Adil Riaz appeal, where the court carefully considered sentencing guidelines, principles of totality, and reductions for guilty pleas. Understand why the appeal was ultimately refused and how the judiciary's approach ensures justice in high-profile criminal cases.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1292

Court clarifies broad interpretation of supply in drug distribution charges under Misuse of Drugs Act 1971

In the case of R v Osman Omar Osman [2023] EWCA Crim 1560, the Court of Appeal clarifies the interpretation of "supply" under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971, emphasizing the broad scope of activities covered by the term. This crucial legal analysis sets a precedent for understanding drug supply offenses.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1560

UK Court Upholds Sentencing for Drug Offenses Using Encrypted Communication: R v Tom Greenfield Case Highlights Role Classification and Aggravating Factors

Discover insights on sentencing for drug offences in the UK through the R v Tom Greenfield case. Uncover the impact of the Sentencing Council's Guideline, role classification in drug supply chains, and the use of encrypted services. Dive into key legal principles and the outcome of the sentencing decision in this detailed analysis.

[2023] EWCA Crim 1294